While Mcgrath and Warne told Waugh to bat again as they were weary, Kasprowicz (in pic) said he was fine if the follow-on was enforced. He went on to regret the decision as he bowled 35 wicketless overs. (Getty Images)

When Steve Waugh’s Australians arrived in India, riding a 15-match winning streak — extended to 16 after a 10-wicket win at the Wankhede — they carried an air of intimidation. Waugh indulged in some aura farming while addressing the media after the win in Mumbai. “I think we made some psychological dents in the opposition,” he had said with a smirk.A week later, it was 31. In the second Test at Eden Gardens in Kolkata, India lasted just 58.1 overs in the first innings and were dismissed for 171 in reply to Australia’s 445.Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW!Australia smelled blood. They had a lead of 274 against a batting line-up low on confidence. Their attack featured Glenn McGrath, Shane Warne, Jason Gillespie and Michael Kasprowicz, and the so-called “final frontier” of conquering India seemed close. Notably, the bowlers had delivered just 12 overs on Day 3, so fatigue hardly appeared to be an issue.

Warne, however, saw things differently. During commentary for Sky Sports during a 2020 England-Pakistan Test at Southampton’s Rose Bowl, he recalled the debate around enforcing the follow-on.“It was 45 degrees, we’d been out on the field a long time, and the wicket was going to get worse,” Warne said. He remembered Waugh checking on his bowlers as India collapsed. McGrath admitted he was “a bit weary”, while Kasprowicz, who had bowled only 13 overs, was eager to continue. Warne felt enforcing the follow-on was a mistake. If Australia had batted again and stretched the lead beyond 450, the game could have unfolded very differently.Former Australia coach John Buchanan has also admitted that the follow-on decision was one of his poorest tactical calls.Waugh, however, remains unapologetic. In an interview with Cricket Australia, he has said, “That’s the way we played at the time — we played positively. I would have liked to have won, but honestly, I haven’t spent one second regretting not beating them or enforcing the follow-on.”The Eden Gardens Test is widely viewed as the match that altered perceptions about the follow-on. Before the game, enforcing it with a 200-run lead was the default aggressive move. But the epic 376-run partnership between VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid as India followed on — turned the match and delivered one of cricket’s most improbable victories.The psychological impact was immense. Between Botham’s Ashes in 1981 at Headingley and the Kolkata Test, captains enforced the follow-on 82 times, winning 64 of those. The only two defeats came against Australia — ironically, the team enforcing it in 2001.Kolkata showed that if a side gets a solid start and two set batters on a true pitch even the best bowling attack can be neutralised. Waugh’s ultra-attacking fields also helped India pierce gaps and score freely.Fatigue eventually became a factor. Australia’s bowlers delivered 178 overs in India’s second innings. By the fifth day, they were exhausted, allowing India to seize control.In modern cricket, protecting fast bowlers has become a priority. Enforcing the follow-on means bowlers must return to the field within minutes of finishing an innings, raising injury risks — especially during long seasons. With rest days long gone from Tests, captains have grown more cautious.India captain Shubman Gill faced this dilemma during a Test against the West Indies in Delhi. After India declared at 518 for 5 and dismissed the visitors for 248, Gill enforced the follow-on despite his bowlers already delivering 81.5 overs.The fatigue showed. West Indies batted 118.5 overs in the second innings before setting India a modest 121-run target. India chased it comfortably but would likely have preferred a lighter workload for the bowlers.Today, captains often choose to bat again. Doing so ensures they bowl last on a deteriorating pitch that may offer sharp turn or variable bounce. It also spares batters the pressure of a fourth-innings chase.Another reason is time management. Even a slow third-innings effort of 50 or 60 overs eats into the match, reducing the chances of defeat and making a draw or victory more likely.Interestingly, the statistics still favour the follow-on. Since the 2001 Eden Gardens Test, captains have enforced it 114 times and won 89 of those matches. There have been 21 draws, and only one defeat — when Ben Stokes’ England lost to New Zealand by one run in Wellington in 2023.Waugh may still have his critics. But he has a statistic ready: after Kolkata, he enforced the follow-on seven more times — and won every one of those Tests.